If you get a set bonus, you may also deserve extra overtime pay.
If you get a set bonus, you may also deserve extra overtime pay.
On July 1, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor issued a new wage/hour opinion (FLSA2019-7) that reminds us of a commonly overlooked overtime miscalculation. The employee asking for guidance is a worker who receives annual bonuses calculated as an extra 1% of the straight time pay earn over the course of the year. The more hours they work in a year, the higher their bonus.
This employee is also non-exempt, meaning that the employee is entitled to overtime pay for all hours over 40 worked in a workweek. For employees who are non-exempt but on salary, this means that the employer divides all pay earned in a pay period by the hours worked to get the “base” or “regular” rate for overtime. For employees who have an hourly pay rate, that is usually the “regular” rate for calculating overtime. Overtime pay is then calculated by taking the regular rate and multiplying by one-and-one-half. During the course of the year, this employee receives overtime pay calculated using this type of calculation.
The question for the Department of Labor was whether the annual bonus increases the base rate for the employee’s overtime calculation. Because the bonus is a pre-set percentage that must be paid at the end of each year, the Department of Labor agreed that this amount needed to be added to the “regular” pay amount once the bonus amount is determined at the end of the year. This means that the employer needs to retrospectively recalculate the regular rate for overtime pay at the end of the year. The recalculation is required by 29 C.F.R. § 778.209(a), which is a part of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act that addresses calculation of overtime.
Importantly, this recalculation is not as simple as taking the bonus amount and dividing by all regular hours worked over the year. Instead, the employer must allocate how much of the bonus was earned in each workweek (based on the hours worked) and recalculate the regular rate for each week based on that number. Only then, can the employer recalculate the additional overtime amount due. Therefore, this employee and all other employees with this pay structure are entitled to back overtime.
There were other aspects to this opinion that are also important but I don’t want to confuse the issues here. The bottom line is that this employer, like so many, don’t realize that non-discretionary bonuses change employee’s base rates for overtime and that they owe these employees adjusted overtime pay at the end of the year. Penalties for violating overtime laws are strict. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, an employee can bring a lawsuit and recover twice the amount of unpaid wages, plus attorney fees and court costs. 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). Under New Mexico’s Minimum Wage Act, NMSA (1978) § 50-4-26, an employee can bring a lawsuit to recover three times the amount of unpaid wages, plus attorney fees, and the employee shall not be required to pay court costs.
If you have any questions about how this opinion letter or how federal or state wage and hour laws relate to your situation, please do not hesitate to call or email Deena Buchanan at 505-900-3559, deena@dbuchananlaw.com.
We have recovered tens of millions of dollars for our clients.
Hospital negligence resulted in catastrophic injury. This was a case involving a patient who entered the hospital for routine observation but left the hospital with catastrophic and permanent injuries due to neglect and improper treatment. This case involved extensive expert testimony on all aspects of the client’s care, both by hospital administration, hospital employees, and contractors who were involved in her treatment.
Semi-truck negligence caused wrongful death. This case involved a semi-truck driver who was intoxicated on illegal substances and killed our client. The key to this case was both aggressive discovery work, and understanding the trucking laws that regulate truck drivers and motor carriers, so we could prove how reckless it was to put the driver on the road that day.
Semi-truck negligence caused catastrophic injury. This case involved a semi-truck driver who lost control of his vehicle in a high-traffic area, causing devastating injuries to our client. We were able to reconstruct every step of the events leading up to the crash that day to piece together why this happened, using sophisticated experts in reconstruction engineering.
Semi-truck and corporate negligence caused traumatic brain injury. Our client suffered a traumatic brain injury as a result of the defendant’s negligence in parking a commercial vehicle. The key to this case was understanding trucking regulations and local ordinances at play to show how the situation should have been handled safely.
Semi-truck causing wrongful death. This sad case involved the tragic death of our clients when a semi-driver was high on illegal substances. The key to this case was working closely with law enforcement and our reconstruction expert to identify all of the assets we could recover for these clients so that they could be as fully compensated as possible.


