New Mexico’s Expanded Medical Cannabis Protections for Employees

New Mexico’s Expanded Medical Cannabis Protections for Employees
Earlier this summer, New Mexico created new protections for employees who use medical cannabis. In the past, employees with prescribed medical use cards were afraid to use their medicine based on fear of a positive drug test at work. New Mexico law now protects many of these employees, though the application of the law is completely untested.
The new addition to the Lynn and Erin Compassionate Use Act, NMSA (1978) §26-2B-9 (the “Act”) went into effect on June 14, 2019. Under the employment protections in the Act, “it is unlawful to take an adverse employment action against an applicant or employee based on” the employee’s use of medical cannabis otherwise allowed under the Act.
The employment protections are limited. If the employer would lose a “monetary benefit” or “licensing” related benefit under federal law, the employer does not have to comply. In other words, if the employer is a federal contractor who is prohibited from having employees use cannabis, the employer may argue that this law does not apply to them. Also, employees are not protected if they use cannabis at work or are impaired at work. The Act further excludes employees who are in “safety-sensitive” positions.
So, with all of its limitations, what does the Act cover? If an employee uses medical cannabis at home, they cannot be terminated just for having a cannabis metabolite show up in a random drug test. In order to take action against an employee for a positive medical cannabis test, the employer would have to show that the employee (1) used cannabis at work, or (2) was impaired at work, or (3) was in a safety-sensitive position or (4) that the employer would lose federal benefits if it complied with the Act.
This Act may pose some real challenges for employers who suspect that an employee is impaired at work. “Impairment” is not defined in the Act and the Act provides no threshold THC or other chemical test result level that would establish any presumption of impairment. This is a matter that appears to be up to our courts to define, perhaps based on a combination of circumstantial evidence, proof of consumption timing, amount of cannabis consumed, and/or expert toxicology reports. Right now, there is nothing defined by the law that we know is sufficient to establish impairment.
If you are an employer struggling with amending your policies and procedures to comply with the Act, or an employee who feels that they did not receive appropriate protections under the Act, contact Deena Buchanan at the Buchanan Law Firm at 505-900-3559.
We have recovered tens of millions of dollars for our clients.
Hospital negligence resulted in catastrophic injury. This was a case involving a patient who entered the hospital for routine observation but left the hospital with catastrophic and permanent injuries due to neglect and improper treatment. This case involved extensive expert testimony on all aspects of the client’s care, both by hospital administration, hospital employees, and contractors who were involved in her treatment.
Semi-truck negligence caused wrongful death. This case involved a semi-truck driver who was intoxicated on illegal substances and killed our client. The key to this case was both aggressive discovery work, and understanding the trucking laws that regulate truck drivers and motor carriers, so we could prove how reckless it was to put the driver on the road that day.
Semi-truck negligence caused catastrophic injury. This case involved a semi-truck driver who lost control of his vehicle in a high-traffic area, causing devastating injuries to our client. We were able to reconstruct every step of the events leading up to the crash that day to piece together why this happened, using sophisticated experts in reconstruction engineering.
Semi-truck and corporate negligence caused traumatic brain injury. Our client suffered a traumatic brain injury as a result of the defendant’s negligence in parking a commercial vehicle. The key to this case was understanding trucking regulations and local ordinances at play to show how the situation should have been handled safely.
Semi-truck causing wrongful death. This sad case involved the tragic death of our clients when a semi-driver was high on illegal substances. The key to this case was working closely with law enforcement and our reconstruction expert to identify all of the assets we could recover for these clients so that they could be as fully compensated as possible.